I read “How to Write a Poem” in a blog that I follow:
Only a fool waits for a poem to come to him.
You have to call for it like a proper blind date,
knocking on its door
and seeing beauty in whatever opens it.
Well, opinions are like elbows — ‘most ever’body’s got a couple.
I write when the muse inspires me.
I have yet to decide “I’m gonna write a poem “ — and then set about to write.
I write to respond to an unbidden urge to express a novel thought.
I write the words that flow... and only when I need a specific word to form a rhyme in the context of a particular concept, or a synonym to contain the thought in the construct of the evolving meter — only then do I search for words ...
My product is not the revelation of an unknown, or explanation of a mystery — it is ever a trip through aspects of my own existence.
So it has been also in my excursions into the arena of fiction — I transcribe the thoughts that are supplied to me ... by what, or whom? I have pondered, and cannot say. Some say that
"...automatic writing or psychography is a ... psychic ability allowing a person to produce written words without consciously writing. The words purportedly arise from a subconscious, spiritual or supernatural source."
That’s an interesting analysis — and I have no comment.
But to me it becomes no less than anathema to be challenged to write a poem based on a particular, supplied word.
I respect those who can pull this off -- and I enjoy reading their poems, My comments are only a description of my personal predilections, not a criticism of others -- most of them certainly more capable, and gifted with a talent that I will never have.
No comments:
Post a Comment